A side-by-side of two agent frameworks for building AI agents — live GitHub data, languages, and what each is best at.
Short answer: CrewAI leads Agno vs CrewAI by community traction (★ 57k vs ★ 42k). Pick Agno for full-stack agents; pick CrewAI for role-based multi-agent teams.
✓ Live data verified
| Agno | CrewAI | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 42k | ★ 57k |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Category | Agent frameworks | Agent frameworks |
| Best for | full-stack agents | role-based multi-agent teams |
| Repository | agno-agi/agno | crewAIInc/crewAI |
Agno and CrewAI are both credible choices. By community traction, CrewAI leads (★ 57k). Pick Agno for full-stack agents; pick CrewAI for role-based multi-agent teams.
Both are credible agent frameworks. By community traction CrewAI leads (★ 57k). Pick Agno for full-stack agents; pick CrewAI for role-based multi-agent teams.
Agno is Batteries-included agent runtime — built-in memory, knowledge/RAG, and AgentOS, a control plane you run in your own cloud. Formerly Phidata.. CrewAI is Role-playing autonomous agents that collaborate as a 'crew' with defined roles, goals, and task delegation..
CrewAI has more — ★ 57k vs ★ 42k (live counts).
Often yes — many teams combine agent frameworks. Check each tool's docs for interop; they solve overlapping but not identical problems.
Agno is primarily Python; CrewAI is primarily Python.
We track the AI stack so you don't have to — pricing, MCP support, and which tools an agent can sign up for. Free.