A side-by-side of two agent frameworks for building AI agents — live GitHub data, languages, and what each is best at.
Short answer: Agno leads Agno vs Strands Agents by community traction (★ 42k vs ★ 6.9k). Pick Agno for full-stack agents; pick Strands Agents for AWS/Bedrock agents.
✓ Live data verified
| Agno | Strands Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 42k | ★ 6.9k |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Category | Agent frameworks | Agent frameworks |
| Best for | full-stack agents | AWS/Bedrock agents |
| Repository | agno-agi/agno | strands-agents/sdk-python |
Agno and Strands Agents are both credible choices. By community traction, Agno leads (★ 42k). Pick Agno for full-stack agents; pick Strands Agents for AWS/Bedrock agents.
Both are credible agent frameworks. By community traction Agno leads (★ 42k). Pick Agno for full-stack agents; pick Strands Agents for AWS/Bedrock agents.
Agno is Batteries-included agent runtime — built-in memory, knowledge/RAG, and AgentOS, a control plane you run in your own cloud. Formerly Phidata.. Strands Agents is AWS's model-driven agent SDK — give it a prompt and tools and let the model plan, call tools, and reflect in a loop. First-class Bedrock, MCP-native, OpenTelemetry tracing..
Agno has more — ★ 42k vs ★ 6.9k (live counts).
Often yes — many teams combine agent frameworks. Check each tool's docs for interop; they solve overlapping but not identical problems.
Agno is primarily Python; Strands Agents is primarily Python.
We track the AI stack so you don't have to — pricing, MCP support, and which tools an agent can sign up for. Free.