A side-by-side of two agent frameworks for building AI agents — live GitHub data, languages, and what each is best at.
Short answer: LlamaIndex leads LlamaIndex vs LangGraph by community traction (★ 51k vs ★ 39k). Pick LlamaIndex for RAG; pick LangGraph for stateful multi-agent workflows.
✓ Live data verified
| LlamaIndex | LangGraph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 51k | ★ 39k |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Category | Agent frameworks | Agent frameworks |
| Best for | RAG | stateful multi-agent workflows |
| Repository | run-llama/llama_index | langchain-ai/langgraph |
LlamaIndex and LangGraph are both credible choices. By community traction, LlamaIndex leads (★ 51k). Pick LlamaIndex for RAG; pick LangGraph for stateful multi-agent workflows.
Both are credible agent frameworks. By community traction LlamaIndex leads (★ 51k). Pick LlamaIndex for RAG; pick LangGraph for stateful multi-agent workflows.
LlamaIndex is Data framework for connecting LLMs to private data — indexing, retrieval, and agentic RAG over your documents.. LangGraph is Graph-based orchestration for stateful, multi-actor agent workflows with explicit control flow and checkpointing..
LlamaIndex has more — ★ 51k vs ★ 39k (live counts).
Often yes — many teams combine agent frameworks. Check each tool's docs for interop; they solve overlapping but not identical problems.
LlamaIndex is primarily Python; LangGraph is primarily Python.
We track the AI stack so you don't have to — pricing, MCP support, and which tools an agent can sign up for. Free.