A side-by-side of two payments & billing for building AI agents — live GitHub data, languages, and what each is best at.
Short answer: Stigg leads Stigg vs Lago by community traction (★ 0 vs ★ 0). Pick Stigg for its strengths; pick Lago for its strengths.
| Stigg | Lago | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 0 | ★ 0 |
| Language | — | — |
| Category | Payments & billing | Payments & billing |
| Best for | ||
| Repository | / | / |
Stigg and Lago are both credible choices. By community traction, Stigg leads (★ 0). Pick Stigg for its strengths; pick Lago for its strengths.
Both are credible payments & billing. By community traction Stigg leads (★ 0). Pick Stigg for its strengths; pick Lago for its strengths.
Stigg is Pricing, packaging and entitlements runtime — the 'usage runtime' that decides what every customer, user and agent is allowed to do, with per-agent budget caps.. Lago is Open-source metering and usage-based billing API — consumption tracking, subscriptions, payment orchestration and revenue analytics, self-host or cloud..
Stigg has more — ★ 0 vs ★ 0 (live counts).
Often yes — many teams combine payments & billing. Check each tool's docs for interop; they solve overlapping but not identical problems.
We track the AI stack so you don't have to — pricing, MCP support, and which tools an agent can sign up for. Free.